Subject:
|
Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 04:41:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
35721 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > For example:
> >
> > | 0 BFC INVERTNEXT
> > | 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud2.dat
> > | 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud2.dat
> >
> > is a double sided part. This part will be detected as "double-sided" and can
> > be changed to single-sided by clicking on it.
>
> Double sided part?
>
> I don't get it at all. Two identical references to a primitive, and the first is
> preceded by a BCF INVERTNEXT instruction. How will it look after being changed
> to single-sided?
>
> Has there been any discussions on this issue so I can get more familiar with the
> problem? It's all new to me.
If such things exist in BFC-certified parts, then they are obviously wrong, but
won't necessarily be visible. It's obviously an error condition, so having the
program detect it seems just to be a useful feature to me. I don't see why
there needs to be any discussion.
After being changed to single-sided (by deleting one of the two sides), it will
either be facing the right way or not, but since the whole purpose of the
program is to get BFC correct, if it's facing the wrong way it should be easy
enough to then fix manually.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
| (...) Double sided part? I don't get it at all. Two identical references to a primitive, and the first is preceded by a BCF INVERTNEXT instruction. How will it look after being changed to single-sided? Has there been any discussions on this issue so (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
