In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> I got a hold vote some time ago to the part:
> http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3004p07.dat
>
> I do not agree with Steffen.
>
> I think we should try to be realistic.
>
> What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins?
>
> cu
> MikeHeide
hi mike,
I design my patterns http://www.holly-wood.it/ldraw/authored-en.html the way "I
THINK they should've produced" and I correct any printing errors, like overlaps,
misalignment, shades of color... In the past I had the same problem with many of
the patterns I made and it cost me 2 month to get rid of the borders in the
Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern - http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3754p02.dat I initially coded
in because my print showed them. I'm glad I fixed the borders, regardless of the
effort - Matthew, Kelly I'm authoring parts not for you but for my own enjoyment
;-)
(...) Hi Willy, In that case I would argue that the onus should be on the designer to choose whether or not to model the ideal or real pattern. If their part is a really weird one then it can be held but if all copies people can see are the same (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: (URL) do not agree with Steffen. I think we should try to be realistic. What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? cu MikeHeide (17 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
