LEGO Elements/Parts : 6048


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6048	6047 \| 6049

Subject:	Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date:	Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:44:38 GMT
Viewed:	3377 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote: > I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3004p07.dat > > I do not agree with Steffen. > > I think we should try to be realistic. > > What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? > > cu > MikeHeide Personally I prefer parts to look as they look not as they "should" look. Sometimes you can even use these imperfections to achieve good effects. Tim

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
(...) You know, this piece typifies the problem with the process and why no new parts get published, at least from my view. The burden of detail required for approval is too onerous. In this particular part the ice cream is fine either way - as the (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

		Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
I had the same argument with Steffen about part 3010pt6.dat (URL) I have a few of these bricks and all of them show the pattern slightly off-center. Also online pictures of this brick seem to be identical. Therefore I created the digital version of (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: (URL) do not agree with Steffen. I think we should try to be realistic. What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? cu MikeHeide (17 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

20 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search