To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6065
6064  |  6066
Subject: 
Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:22:24 GMT
Viewed: 
3856 times
  
I read the reviewing FAQ, and it definitely seems to encourage the current
practices.

--Travis

That's why as a part reviewer I try to follow this guidelines and I am much
stricter that my own opinion would lead me. Yes, I am for some relaxation of the
rules in order to get more "good enough" parts.

Philo



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
 
(...) This thread also seems to have brought up another very important question: Are the current review policies too strict, preventing parts that are "good enough" from getting in to users' hands in a timely manner? I've seen a number of posts in (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

20 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR