LEGO Elements/Parts : 6058


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6058	6057 \| 6059

Subject:	Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:24:39 GMT
Viewed:	3861 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote: > I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3004p07.dat > > I do not agree with Steffen. > > I think we should try to be realistic. > > What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? > > cu > MikeHeide Looking at the comments so far we seem to be answering two different questions so I'm going to explicitly ask both of them: Should we try to model the idealised part? Should a part by held if it matches a real part but not an "ideal" part? Tim

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
(...) This thread also seems to have brought up another very important question: Are the current review policies too strict, preventing parts that are "good enough" from getting in to users' hands in a timely manner? I've seen a number of posts in (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:

		Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: (URL) do not agree with Steffen. I think we should try to be realistic. What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? cu MikeHeide (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

20 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search