 | | part # 47404 boat base [DAT]
|
|
i made this for rendering porposes. alot of missing quads and such under side. mockup till finished. 0 Boat Base Bow 12 x 10 0 Name: 47404.ldr 1 16 -90 4 -10 -1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 -1 stud3.dat 1 16 -100 4 0 -1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 -1 stud3.dat 2 24 -96 24 -26 (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973psj.dat [DAT]
|
|
This version uses the revised subfiles for 973psb/psj. Also, I adjusted the size of the insignia (i.e., the two horizontal bars). I've already asked Thomas (offline) for his blessing to post this revision. I'm posting this here because the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2440.dat [DAT]
|
|
Per Admin request..... Am sending to Admins via email, as well..... 0 Hinge 6 x 3 Radar/Blade/Spoiler/Panel 0 Name: 2440.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Official LCad update 98-08 0 KEYWORDS Space, MTron, Blacktron, Blacktron 2, Blacktron II 0 (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) This is in my "delvolopment" queue for LDraw.org features. Unless Steve adds this to the PT, I think I can whip up a website module. -Orion (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) Yes, that's true. I do drop a mail to this list when I'd like to announce a part (in those rare cases when I have time to do some part authoring). The problem is that you get only feedback if the other part author working on the same part (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) "Working on" (...) duplicate (...) I thought that was one of the purposes of lugnet.cad.dat.parts ?!?!?!? (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) I join to Niel's opinion, it would be useful to have a so called "Working on" list to announce if an author is working on a certain part, to avoid duplicate efforts. The precursor of present day Part Tracker (I don't remember its proper name) (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
I wasn't only talking about abandoned parts, but all the ones people are working on that'll take a long time to finish. (since the other ones probably gets finished before somebody else starts on them). But now you're forgiven (for the sins you’ve (...) (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) It may be required by the part tracker, but it isn't required by the BFC spec. The spec specifically says that the first instance of any BFC command in a file implicitly turns on BFC certification in the file (unless of course it's a 0 BFC (...) (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) No it isn't. (...) You are correct. CERTIFY, according to the BFC spec, is only allowed once in the file, before the first 'executable' line, on the very first BFC meta-statement. In fact, CERTIFY is *required* on that line. Steve (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion... [DAT]
|
|
Please let me know if this works OK now...... Thanks......... 0 Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) If so, then I missed it too (which is entirely possible!) I've never used CERTIFY at the beginning of a file, and TMK it's never been a problem. I use "BFC INVERTNEXT" where necessary, but no blanket CERTIFY statement. Is the inclusion of the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every BFC line? I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something? -Kyle (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Since you used a mirrored reference to the subfiles, you should not need the INVERTNEXT statements. (...) With 2D objects, you should flip & rotate them to show their front face, not use INVERTNEXT. Steve (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC inversion...
|
|
this is the first time I've tried using the "invertnext" BFC statement. would someone plz double check my code? thnx....... (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
uses these two subfiles: (URL) Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain, based on Matt Schild's original 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB2.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
2nd of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Plates; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb2.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 COMMENT Gaps in chest plates for (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB1.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
1st of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Detail; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb1.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 // 2004-10-04 FWC BFC-ed 4 16 -12 0 (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) How far have you gotten with that? I was working on that one awhile ago, but I never finished it. If you're interested, I can send you what I have. (...) Umm, I've got a 30086c01 (Inflatable Boat) that's finished, but can't be separated into (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) the 4876 Fabuland Slide part. (...) I'm working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset, which is really nasty and wont be finished soon. After that I plan on using the primitives for that one to improve (and BFC) on the other (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Working on 4876.dat Fabuland Slide part
|
|
Dear List, Just to inform other part authors and avoid parallel development, I'm working on the 4876 Fabuland Slide part. (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | mockup for part 4860new [DAT]
|
|
here is a file i made for a extreme team set. just a mockup ~subfile~ 0 Tyre Single Smooth *4860mu* 0 Name: 7amu.ldr 0 Author: James Jessiman 0 Original LDraw Part - LDraw beta 0.27 Archive 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) T2 is my lazy way of abbreviating "Type 2". T4 = Type 4, etc. I will look into LDScript. Thanks! Edwin :-) Edwin (20 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) The general standard is to go up to 3 decimal places in part files. I agree, main vertices really don't need more than 1 or 2 places. For derived vertices, more precision may be require to keep everything aligned, so going out to 3 places is (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) Features wish list For the purpose of improved readability in LDAO, I thought of entering each vertex with 2 decimal places. Then I discovered the color-coded vertices in LDDP. It was better, but I still wish the vertices aligned in columns. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Just a suggestion, maybe the axle primitives could be changed to include a simple 45 degree chamfer there? This would affect quite a few parts, but I doubt there would be many that would need changing if they use the axle primitives as (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) If possible, can you measure the distance diagonally across the minimum radius part of a cross axle? My guess is this problem has shown up because the concave curve at that point of the cross axles has not been modelled in the Ldraw (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
I personally round off the numbers to 4 decimals, but I’ve been known to do crazy stuff like modelling in 1/100 (max zoom in mlcad) and use 1-24 parts of high res primitives from time to time. But I would suggest you to round off to (at least) two (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing this, Niels. Is changing the diameter of these axles from 8 to 7.5 really worth it? They still won't fit in most axleholes, because LDraw's axles don't fit the actual geometry of technic axleholes. However, I am *not* (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) I have measured several of these metal axles with a caliper from different kinds of wheels (studded train wheel with traction teeth, studded train wheel conical hub, spoked train wheel conical hub, spoked train wheel straight hub, studded (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) I'll measure the axles of all these kinds of wheels tonight. I have all different wheels with these axles. Niels (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Not a big deal. As long as we're communicating, it's OK. :) (...) Please don't do that. If there are problems in files, then let's correct the errors (or come to agreement that they aren't actually errors). (...) Uh, what is x573? Is it used (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Consistency with existing parts is good. (...) Sorry, my reviewing wasn't very complete. I should have asked for a repositioning of all of these files, so that the inside surface of the plastic wheel would be at the origin. This is an (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Sorry about the lack of reply. I don't have most of these older wheels, so I'm not familiar enough with them to really comment on physical aspects. I can only answer from the POV of a parts librarian. (...) That's understandable. And I agree (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Hi All, Sorry if my english is not very well. I've create Wheel Axle Metal (x568s03.dat), because size of 35b.dat is not good. The corect size (diameter) for this part should be 6LDU and not 8LDU. For understand this size, see the my Technic (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New sticker: train 133 [DAT]
|
|
To finish a digital image of train 133 I have created the sticker. I do have the actual stickers, which I used as source. Here's a povray result: (URL) this image contains several unofficial parts) I don't have a partnumber. Any suggestions for the (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
Okay, I know it's a bad thing to reply to your own posts, but as I haven't got any answer and I do want this issue solved, I found it okay to kick this up again. Please read the first post in this topic. One more thing why I prefer to have the (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts: yellow drive rod and red holder [DAT]
|
|
And the code for the yellow drive rod: 0 Train Steam Drive Rod 0 Name: xSteamRod.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 Unofficial Element 0 CMDLINE -c14 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 --Outer Edges 2 24 0 -9 -3.25 140 -9 -3.25 2 24 0 -9 3.25 140 -9 3.25 2 24 140 -9 (...) (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New parts: yellow drive rod and red holder [DAT]
|
|
Last weekend I finished the red holder part for the old yellow steam train drive rod. In this first version I ommited the small gap near the centre stud hole. For the real part this gap is used to make the hole stretch a bit to fit the stud of a (...) (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3041p01.dat Brick 45 2 x 4 Double With Headlamp Pattern
|
|
(...) 3041p01 is fine, but I like the existing peeron title "Slope Brick 45 2 x 4 Double with Blue and White Headlight Pattern" Please use your real name in the Author: line (...) Not necessary and IMHO undesirable if there are few patterned (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
