Subject:
|
Re: BFC inversion...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:25:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4390 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> > > > 1 2 -9.875 9.875 -10 1.625 0 -1.25 -1.625 0 -1.25 0 1 0 1-4ndis.dat
> > > > 0 BFC CERTIFY INVERTNEXT
> > > > 1 2 -10.125 10.125 -10 -1.625 0 -1.25 1.625 0 -1.25 0 1 0 1-4ndis.dat
> > > > 1 2 -8.625 11.625 -10 -1.625 0 1.25 1.625 0 1.25 0 1 0 1-4ndis.dat
> > > > 0 BFC CERTIFY INVERTNEXT
> > > > 1 2 -8.375 11.375 -10 1.625 0 1.25 -1.625 0 1.25 0 1 0 1-4ndis.dat
> >
> >
> > With 2D objects, you should flip & rotate them to show their front face, not use
> > INVERTNEXT.
>
>
> Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every
> BFC line?
>
> I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the
> file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something?
If so, then I missed it too (which is entirely possible!) I've never used
CERTIFY at the beginning of a file, and TMK it's never been a problem. I use
"BFC INVERTNEXT" where necessary, but no blanket CERTIFY statement.
Is the inclusion of the initial CERTIFY necessary in terms of BFC, or is it
intended more as a formatting standard?
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BFC inversion...
|
| (...) Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every BFC line? I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something? -Kyle (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
