Subject:
|
Re: BFC inversion...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:57:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4573 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every
> BFC line?
No it isn't.
> I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the
> file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something?
You are correct. CERTIFY, according to the BFC spec, is only allowed once in
the file, before the first 'executable' line, on the very first BFC
meta-statement. In fact, CERTIFY is *required* on that line.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: BFC inversion...
|
| (...) It may be required by the part tracker, but it isn't required by the BFC spec. The spec specifically says that the first instance of any BFC command in a file implicitly turns on BFC certification in the file (unless of course it's a 0 BFC (...) (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
| (...) Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every BFC line? I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something? -Kyle (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
