 | | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) this is good news ... at least for me ;-) (...) this will hopefully become good news. many thx for sorting this out and giving me a helping hand. bye, w. (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) Looking at how the geometry is layed out, I think you've hit a limitation in LDView's smoothing algorithm. In other words, the lack of smoothness is caused by a problem with LDView, not by a problem with your layout. The basic cause of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs writes: hi travis, (...) thx for the tip. I remodeled the whole thing and were able to fix it, well almost... looking closely in LDView you can see a rough area where the two 2-4ndis meet the rest of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) I'm not sure the part authors will be able to help you, but my knowledge of LDView probably will. After looking at it in LDView (without actually trying to read your DAT code), I believe the problem is that you have a T-intersection, and the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
Could some of the senior-authors please have a look at the cond. lines? I'm in trouble with the section around the visor holes. I tried to add some cond. lines but LDView still doesn't show it with a smooth surface. I have no idea what's wrong. Many (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) I checked some geometry websites, and the consensus is that these are tori. Just not the common type. (...) Inverse-ratio torus is a better name, but is fairly lengthy. An inverted torus, I think, is still a torus, just with the surfaces (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) When Steve and I were working on the format for the torii, I believe we said we would deal with this issue when it arose. Now it has. (...) The spreadsheet I made to create p/16 and p/48 torii also included support for this occurance. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) I'm not terribly surprised. This is a great solution, as then, if for some reason in the future, inverse ratio tori are needed, they can use the same convention, just a different starting letter and inverting the ratio as appropriate in the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) You might be surprised at how close t04o9999.dat would come. I can't see that it's any worse than the current t04o3333.dat file. Actually, I think I'm going to modify LDView to recognize nnnn in the minor fraction (where n is 0-9) to be (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Primitive Class
|
|
Actually, it's not a new primitive, but it doesn't fit under the current naming scheme. My current 33089 (in PT) is a rather bulky file (55KB), so to streamline it, I decided to make a few new primitives. One of these was a torus with major radius 1 (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) I think I agree with that. Actually, I could go either way. (...) Right. (...) I'm opposed to allowing additional comments between INVERTNEXT and the statements it affects -- one program's 'comment' is another program's 'meta-statement'. OTOH, (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 892 [DAT]
|
|
Hi, my name is Johan Vettefors and I've been lurking around here for some time. I have a question about the ldraw library. The part 892.dat which the tringle with clip in for example the lego sets speeder bikes and naboo swamp is NOT identical to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 4180
|
|
(...) I thought I remembered a more recent discussion about this, but I can't find it. What I'm seeing is that really instead of the current part 4180 there should be three composite parts: 4180c01--Brick 2 x 4 with Permanent Black Train Wheels (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) checking. (...) I guess I should have picked this up in the final checking for the 2003-01 parts release. Regardless of the results of this discussion, I have submitted a fixed part to the Parts Tracker. Chris (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Actually this is stated in the BFC spec but it wasn't enforced until the PT was created. -Orion (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) I personally feel that whitespace should be ignored. However, if that is the case, the BFC spec should probably be updated to note this. It might also be argued that further comments after the INVERTNEXT should also be ignored. However, I (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Actually, no it wouldn't. It would render incorrectly after the primitive was BFC certified if you guessed wrong about the ultimate orientation of the polygons in the primitive. However, until the primitive is certified, it will not be BFC'd, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) No I thin khe meant that only new and updated primitives are required to be BFC compliant to be accepted to the parts tracker. Parts are still accepted that aren't certified though that is preferable. Though I'm not sure I've seen anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote: > Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 1 > 9 INVERTNEXT 2 > 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a 3 > 9 subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately 4 > 9 (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat? [DAT]
|
|
The file has these lines: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat Is an empty line allowed after INVERTNEXT? Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 9 INVERTNEXT 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) insist? Did you mean await? The whole file including primitives should be BFC compliant to have the CERTIFY. (...) Yes, a NOCERTIFY can be considered as a (temporary) turn-off-BFC, and other BFC statements should silently be ignored. /Lars (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) IIRC, my claim of making this BFC compliant was found to be incorrect when reviewed in the PT. So to expedite its release, I suspect Steve did an admin edit of the 0 BFC CERTIFY line (since we only insist on BFC compliance for primitives) to (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) You're welcome. (...) I understand that every effort is made to prevent errors, and also that this will never prevent all errors. I posted the message in order to determine if this case is indeed an error. I posted to this group because I'm (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Hi travis, Thanks for LDView, Each part is carefully reviewed by volunteers in Parts Tracker. That means if a part says CERTIFY you can be pretty confident regarding its usage of BFC-ed primitives. I think errors are still possible with (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
I think part 970s01.dat has a BFC problem. I'm working on my BFC parsing in LDView, and it printed an error in this file, so I went and looked at it. At the beginning of the file, it says: 0 BFC NOCERTIFY Then later in the file, it says: 0 BFC (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Ok thanks for the help guys. Maybe I should attempt drawing the part myself or recreate 6057.dat to fit my needs? :) Jos (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Jos Henckens <jos.henckens@nephilimco.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:m2047vo7vu2v91l...4ax.com... (...) The name "Bar .. Tapered" is "Boat Rigging .." in the parts-list. Only the smaller one is an official part. I'm not sure if the larger one has (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
(...) Only found the smaller version of this, part number 6057.dat. Should be under other parts, b in mlcad. (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Hello I'm looking for following part as described on (URL) : 2541 Brown Bar 5 x 28 Tapered I can't find it between the updates (both official and unofficial )at ldraw.org. Looking this number up at lugnet.com led me to some minifig parts? The part (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
Thanks for both the welcome and the help with the part numbers. I may start work on the 3070bp02 and 3070bp03 over the weekend (I have them in pixelated form, which are too large for submission, but I find useful for figuring out where to fill with (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) (URL)and (...) (URL)Also, some of the inventories in Peeron mention a tile with "thick 3" (...) (URL)or yet another pattern. (...) OK - I'll assign p01 thru p04 for the thin black figures, as in set 6395. You're right, there is a thick "3", (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) (URL) some of the inventories in Peeron mention a tile with "thick 3" pattern---I have no idea if that's 3070bp03 (URL) yet another pattern. -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) Welcome. (...) No - there is currently no linkage between the peeron pattern numbers (which just start with x1 and increment) and the official LDraw pattern numbers which we try to categorise. So please do use 30363ps1. (...) Yes - this is as (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick [DAT]
|
|
Hi all. I'm slowing delurking across Lugnet. I've been a member for a while, but I just watched and learned for nearly a year. I think I've got the LDraw system down fairly well, so I gave a try at some patterned parts (seeing that these are easier (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2867.dat - Train Track 9V Curved (Mockup) 4 of 4
|
|
(...) < SNIP> Hi Tore, Verry nice work, i didn't start yet on the curved track, so what are you intend to do? Will you complete this part, or do you want some help? Regards, Ludo (22 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Obsolete subpart at the PT
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out - parts/s/973pn0a.dat has been deleted now. Chris (22 years ago, 9-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Obsolete subpart at the PT
|
|
dear admins, the subpart Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Dragon Pattern: (URL) become obsolete. the code has been inlined in the already released official file: (URL) you please delete it? w. (22 years ago, 9-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A Piece in CAD
|
|
(...) This piece has not been officially released yet and is not on the Parts Tracker I believe the name (if it were existing in the virtual world) would be Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted. Cheers, --Ryan ryanjf@ifriendly.com (URL) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | A Piece in CAD
|
|
Hullo CAD'ers ive been trying to Cad my models as I dont have easy access to a digi cam, so I was wondering if any of you knew where this piece, (URL) in MLCAD(the program of my choice)or if it had been put into LDRAW's files.... Any help would be (...) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Panel 1 x 2 x 2 without front - Two different versions at the PT
|
|
(...) parts/s/4864s.dat has been deleted from the PT. Chris (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
