Subject:
|
Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:41:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6345 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Jim Foulds wrote:
> > Thanks for all the input. I appreciate the views that were presented. I’ve
> > noticed over the past few years that the cadding community has been producing
> > some very nice tools. And now Lego has released there own (LDD). Is there a
> > team from the community working with Lego on how they could make LDD better? Or
> > is the interest more along how to make the two work together?
>
> We (the SteerCo) are in contact with the LDD team.
>
> My personal opinion is that the two are designed for different user-bases so
> combatibility is more important than helping them (or they us).
"Combatibility?" Was that a Freudian slip, or an intentional Yogi Berra-ism?
Either way, it's pretty funny. :)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
| (...) We (the SteerCo) are in contact with the LDD team. My personal opinion is that the two are designed for different user-bases so combatibility is more important than helping them (or they us). Tim (20 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
