Subject:
|
LDD vs LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:42:34 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1709 times
|
| |
|
|
Hey gang,
So with the update on licensing soon to be finished for the LDraw community,
it got me to thinking about the Pros and Cons of LDD vs the LDraw toolset. So I
thought I would throw it out to the community to see what other thought.
What are the Pros and Cons of each?
What do people like about each tool?
What do people not like about each tool?
Is there any feature that one has that we wish the other had?
- Jim F.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
| (...) I think there's some discussion on this topic already, but my view is that LDD and LDRAW each have their place. LDD Pros: -Easy to use with a gentler learning curve. Most kids can figure it out. -Quite rapid to construct models. -Real-time (...) (18 years ago, 13-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
| (...) I have used LDD (a little) and MLcad (occasionally over several years) and had already given this topic some thought, so here goes. If I were writing a new CAD program, it would do everything MLcad can do today, plus: I like the way that LDD (...) (18 years ago, 13-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
| (...) Well gang, Thanks for all the input. I appreciate the views that were presented. I’ve noticed over the past few years that the cadding community has been producing some very nice tools. And now Lego has released there own (LDD). Is there a (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
