| |
"Hendo (John P. Henderson)" <hendo@valyance.com> wrote in message
news:HEL3JA.14I0@lugnet.com...
> Time for me to play devil's advocate...
>
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > Thus, as citizen we must demand greater freedoms.
>
> At the risk of sounding elitist, I point out that the "citizens" of Lugnet
> are arguably the paying members. As a member who posts exclusively via • the
> web interface, I have no knowledge of the difficult verifications I keep
> hearing about. Few of us would hesitate to drop $10 on a night at the
> movies (or whatever), so I think the $10 to be a member here is very
> reasonable. Is this problem indeed something members encounter?
I am a member and still have to verify my post.
It is not dificult to do that, so i dont think it is a big problem.
But It would be nice if we could have a system where non-paying members or
non-members have to ferify their post, and those who have paid can skip this
verifying.
Only problem I see with the verifying post is that the answer to a post can
be delayed some hours, since I not always remember to verify my post the
minute after I have posted them....
> If the verification problem is something that even members get when not
> using the interface that I do, then I argue that maybe the web interface • is
> your solution if you really don't like the system, and who among us • doesn't
> have a web browser available half the time anyway?
I am not using the web-interface. Why? Well I have got used to do this
trough the news reader in Microsoft Outlook Express (I know that this is not
a good news reader/editor but I do not need more fancy stuff).
Regards
Øyvind Steinnes
http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/?m=1983
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
53 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
