| |
"Dave Low" <stinglessbee@hotSPAMFREEmail.com> wrote in message
news:GJx646.ICw@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lester Witter writes:
> > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It appears to me that your post is nothing but a troll for a bunch • of angry
> > > > > > > replies... but I may be wrong.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2 - "news" in the sense that it is an incomplete and largely false • picture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Show what is false Larry. Show us.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Scott A
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ++Lar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's no solution, it's tripe.
> > >
> > > That is easy to say when you are not willing the justify your comment.
> > >
> > > > Just a bunch of warmed over false rhetoric.
> > >
> > > That is easy to say when you are not willing the justify your comment. • Show
> > > us what is "false" - I doubt you can.
> >
> > ... and it looks like I was correct.
> >
> > Scott A
> >
> > > >
> > > > > ...and you have not answered my question.
> > >
> > >
> > > You are wrong.
> > >
> > > Scott A
>
> Is it time to put an end to this? Could Scott and Larry be banned from
> replying to each other for a trial period at least?
>
> just an idea,
> DaveL
I actually replied to myself.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
