To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12620
12619  |  12621
Subject: 
Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:28:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1219 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> 
> It appears to me that your post is nothing but a troll for a bunch of angry
> replies... but I may be wrong.
> 
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > To the people who think that the subject line isn't the right way to view
> > what needs to be done now, I would invite you to suggest another course of
> > action.
> > 
> > Ignoring the problem isn't going to work.
> > Appeasement isn't going to work.
> > Sanctions aren't going to work.
> > Cruise missiles lobbed in from a safe distance aren't going to work.
> > Turning the free world into a police state isn't going to work. (1)
> > 
> > So what *will* work? I think we all want to know. Don't just take pot shots
> > at the big bad US-Israeli axis. It's old "news"(2). Let's hear concrete
> > proposals.
> 
> I'm glad you have broken your own moratorium Larry, I have been waiting to
> ask you if you still think removing federal involvement in air safety
> regulation is a good thing? Do you think a deregulated air safety regime
> would have prevented the hijacks on Tuesday – or even made them less likely?
> I ask this within the context of my knowledge that the air industry
> effectively watered down the proposals made during the Clinton administration.
> 
> 
> > 
> > 1 - I just got back from GRR where I returned my rental and picked up my
> > car. Spooky. Dogs everywhere, concrete barriers, no cars within 300 feet
> > unless escorted, rental lots relocated to far away, Way overreacting I
> > think, but just a harbinger of more to come, I fear.
> > 
> > 2 - "news" in the sense that it is an incomplete and largely false picture.
> 
> Show what is false Larry. Show us.
> 
> Scott A
> 
> > 
> > ++Lar

What is being proposed is not Air safety but Defense against forign (or
possibly domestic) attack. Defending the people is a primary function of any
governnment even under the most libertarian models.

Lester (Who almost always agrees with Larry and so does not often have to post)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
 
(...) I have already solved that problem: (URL) you have not answered my question. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
 
It appears to me that your post is nothing but a troll for a bunch of angry replies... but I may be wrong. (...) I'm glad you have broken your own moratorium Larry, I have been waiting to ask you if you still think removing federal involvement in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR