| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:
>
> > AUK is defintely alt.usenet.kooks. I have spent some time there myself, it • is
> > definitely a flame group. The entire purpose of the group is to ridicule,
> > well, "usenet kooks". People that post there generally get there in one of
> > two
> > ways- either they go there purposefully to flame away [1], or they end up
> > getting dragged in there because someone else *thinks* they're a kook.
>
> D'oh! I forgot my own footnote.
>
> [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big
> crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as
> alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa 1995-7, anyway), etc.
> Beleive it or not, I've never posted anything anywhere on Lugnet that I would
> consider to be a flame.
It is not what you consider to be a flame which is important - do you agree?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My point.
|
| (...) In all seriousness, I don't understand your question, mostly because if it were communicated verbally, there would have been emphasis on one word or another to give me a clue what you meant. I'll assume what you meant is: "It's not what *you* (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My point.
|
| (...) D'oh! I forgot my own footnote. [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
