Subject:
|
Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:37:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
255 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> If anyone feels that Matthew's
> posting privileges should not be suspended, please speak up.
I think Mathew made a lot of points; some were quite enlightening, some were
pertinent and some I can't agree with one bit. However, as far as I can see it
looks like you reacted to his criticism of you more than anything else. This
makes you look weak. As does your past insinuations about his parents.
Further, your earlier referenced attack on JW also did you no favours, and
neither does your continued attack on Matthew when you have given him no
chance to reply.
The two posts I mentioned above (RE JW and Mattews Parents) are probably
amongst the most shameful made to LUGENT which I have read.
I said a week or so ago that kids read these pages too with and without
their parents consents. So lets be nice to each other and talk Lego. Lets be
inclusive, and not exclusive.
Scott A
> [1] Yes, I have permission to republish these comments here. It's part of
> the Terms of Use Agreement that anything submitted to LUGNET is subject to
> being republished. I don't regularly post feedback comments publicly, of
> course...this is the first time, and I hope it's the last.
You may be right - but I think you were wrong.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
17 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Scott Arthur (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.terms)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Todd Lehman (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.terms)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Larry Pieniazek (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.terms)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Todd Lehman (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.terms)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Scott Arthur (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.terms)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Todd Lehman (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Scott Arthur (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Todd Lehman (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Scott Arthur (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Let s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Frank Filz (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Todd Lehman (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![(Cancelled)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Scott Arthur (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Larry Pieniazek (19-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Selçuk Göre (20-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lets be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.) -Selçuk Göre (20-Oct-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|