To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7988
7987  |  7989
Subject: 
Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:37:49 GMT
Viewed: 
343 times
  
If anyone feels that Matthew's
posting privileges should not be suspended, please speak up.


I think Mathew made a lot of points; some were quite enlightening, some were
pertinent and some I can't agree with one bit. However, as far as I can see it
looks like you reacted to his criticism of you more than anything else. This
makes you look weak. As does your past insinuations about his parents.
Further, your earlier referenced attack on JW also did you no favours, and
neither does your continued attack on Matthew when you have given him no
chance to reply.

The two posts I mentioned above (RE JW and Mattews Parents) are probably
amongst the most shameful made to LUGENT which I have read.

I said a week or so ago that kids read these pages too – with and without
their parents consents. So lets be nice to each other and talk Lego. Let’s be
inclusive, and not exclusive.

Scott A


[1] Yes, I have permission to republish these comments here.  It's part of
the Terms of Use Agreement that anything submitted to LUGNET is subject to
being republished.  I don't regularly post feedback comments publicly, of
course...this is the first time, and I hope it's the last.

You may be right - but I think you were wrong.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
 
(...) I had a look at the feedback page: (URL) Questions: 1. Does one have to read the terms / agree to the terms / be a member / to post feedback? 2. Does line "here is your chance to share some thoughts privately" at least imply the communication (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
  Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
 
(...) Interesting guess, but wrong. Here are the threshold breakers: (URL) [1] Yes, I have permission to republish these comments here. It's part of (...) Thanks for your input. You may be right about it being a bad idea to post feedback comments as (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR