Subject:
|
Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:25:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
660 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> I'm not sure I do want to speak to him, but I'm also not sure about how is
> banning came about. I pointed out posts earlier which (I think) were worse
> than his. So why were they allowed, when his "input" is not?
Below is a copy of a message I have just written to Matthew via e-mail.
If Matthew does show up here today, please try to keep things as civil as
possible.
--Todd
_____________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:24:33 -0400
From: Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com>
Organization: LUGNET - www.lugnet.com
To: moulton@hscis.net, moulton@innw.net
Subject: posting
Matthew,
There is some concern that your posting to LUGNET has been blocked without
giving you ample opportunity to respond and/or defend your position.
I think that your concerns are very important issues, but the way you
brought them up wasn't in a manner to which the community is accustomed.
I have removed the block for lugnet.admin.general, where you are free to
participate in discussions relating to the concerns you have raised, so long
as you avoid insulting people or causing additional flamewars. It is OK
with me if you flame, insult, or criticise me or LUGNET in
lugnet.admin.general, but please do not flame, insult, or criticise other
people there.
Thanks,
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
