LUGNET Terms of Use : 255


Administrative / Terms of Use / 255	254 \| 256

Subject:	Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.terms
Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:20:07 GMT
Viewed:	4767 times

> > [1] Yes, I have permission to republish these comments here. It's part of > > the Terms of Use Agreement that anything submitted to LUGNET is subject to > > being republished. I don't regularly post feedback comments publicly, of > > course...this is the first time, and I hope it's the last. > > You may be right - but I think you were wrong. I had a look at the feedback page: http://www.lugnet.com/admin/feedback/ 3 Questions: 1. Does one have to read the terms / agree to the terms / be a member / to post feedback? 2. Does line "here is your chance to share some thoughts privately" at least imply the communication is private? 3. Does the "(optional)" tag on two of the boxes imply anonymity? Scott A

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
(...) What do you think? (...) You could infer that. (...) That would be a stretch. --Todd (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:

		Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
(...) I think Mathew made a lot of points; some were quite enlightening, some were pertinent and some I can't agree with one bit. However, as far as I can see it looks like you reacted to his criticism of you more than anything else. This makes you (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search