Subject:
|
Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:33:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
678 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > I'm not sure I do want to speak to him, but I'm also not sure about how is
> > > banning came about. I pointed out posts earlier which (I think) were worse
> > > than his. So why were they allowed, when his "input" is not?
> >
> > Below is a copy of a message I have just written to Matthew via e-mail.
> > If Matthew does show up here today, please try to keep things as civil as
> > possible.
>
> Unnecessary in my opinion. Scott always seems to want to play devil's
> advocate
Play? I am the devil's advocate. :-)
It can be a bit one sided here at times.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
