Subject:
|
Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 Sep 1999 17:38:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4018 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 19:10:52 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> market.theory as NOT being proper for discussion of whether auctions are
> actually a good thing, or whether the free market works, or whether
> auctions are conceptually fair, or whether capitalism and market forces
> are good or evil. That properly is the subject of off-topic.debate...
Disagree, as long as it's in relation to LEGO.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
| (...) "Roit!" As long as it's still in relation to LEGO, all of those fit into the charter of .market.theory: "Theory, techniques, methodologies, algorithms, systems, and socio- psychology: in-depth analysis, comparisons, discussion, theoretical (...) (27 years ago, 11-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
| Frank Filz wrote: <snip nice hierarchy/gradation discussion> Well said, I agree with your classification scheme, o Linnaeus. :-) (...) Yes. This is a bit of a hot button for me. I think if you ran an analysis of my posts here on LUGNET(tm) overall a (...) (27 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
