Subject:
|
Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:11:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
652 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
> news:37d96fa0.5249582@lugnet.com...
>
> > > What about
> > > (for example) DYA? He's got multiple copies of a single set, but posts • to
> > > .buy-sell-trade. Should he be told that .shopping is a more appropriate • venue?
> > > How about BAYLIT?
> >
> >
> > > And what of the (hypothetical) situation where a major retailer sees an
> > > opportunity to catch a specialized group - if eToys or TRU starts • posting
> > > messages, where would they go?
> >
> > .market.shopping
>
> Maybe it's just that some of the newer people missed some of the discussion
> leading up to the various groups, but it's always seemed obvious to me that
> .shopping would be for stores to post their own info (in addition to the
> fairly common "TRU has a sale in my town" posts we're seeing) while
> .buy-sell-trade would be for more personal, one-on-one things.
But why put put both in the same newsgroup? Having a newsgroup hierarchy
allows these two types of messages to be separated from each other. Someone
using mindstorms might not care about Duplo, so those two are separated.
Someone who cares about "TRU sales in my town" might not care about stores
posting their own overpriced merchandise ads, so those should be separated.
You're the one who told me I should subscribe to .shopping so I wouldn't keep
missing sales. :-)
I've already posted more of this argument :
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=2859
Thanks,
Naji
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
| (...) Before this discussion goes off in the wrong direction, I want to clarify a little. I understand that the newsgroup hierarchy can't and shouldn't be chopped into millions of newsgroups, each with 3 messages in it. However, even Mike shows a (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
| (...) I don't know that I totally disagree with you (I'm certainly not taking "another side" against which you would need to defend yourself) but at this point in time I don't see what the big deal is. It seems like one or two people who maybe (...) (25 years ago, 11-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Items on The Vault - 9/9/99
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:37d96fa0.524958...net.com... (...) to (...) venue? (...) posting (...) Maybe it's just that some of the newer people missed some of the discussion leading up to the various groups, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
