Subject:
|
Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 1999 10:27:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
587 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> I'm beginning to like the suggestion someone made earlier of just canning
> the group and letting these things fall where they may, or into .off-
> topic.fun or .general or wherever the most appropriate place is in each
> case.
>
> --Todd
I agree. Considering that this is supposed to be fun, I think too many people
are making this way to cerebral!!! Its beginning to look a whole lot like the
dreaded LEGO/LEGOS threads.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
| Kill QOTD, I don't care, it's the easiest solution. It's not a high value add group anyway. But I do think we need to explore the mechanics and technology of moderation as a community experiment. Moderation (or review of information) will appear (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
| (...) There's another icky sticky problem with moderated groups. When you post to one, your message disappears into the wild blue yonder. You don't find out whether your post made it there or not until you either see it minutes/ hours/days later or (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
