Subject:
|
Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 May 1999 21:03:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@ANTISPAMgeocities.com
|
Viewed:
|
535 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Here's the jist behind the group --
> (this is a crummy name but it gets the idea across):
> lugnet.off-topic.quotes.heard-within-lugnet
For a "Best of LUGNET" type of event?
> It's like a whiteboard where you write funny things someone says at lunch or
> during a meeting or wherever. But it's -not- for posting quips or a maxims
> or proverbs or lists of quotes from outside places -- not like that at all.
But this is the general usage of said white boards, at least in my
experience. Typically, someone would write a thoughtful / silly /
angst-ridden / etc. message from an *outside* source, in order to share that
message with the (relatively) inner group.
> Thoughts? Is this group, by its very name, no matter how carefully worded
> in the charter, doomed and destined to being destroyed and recreated under a
> different name, or not at all?
Especially under the name of "quote of the day", this new group implies this
same sort of behavior.
And why not? We continually make LUGNET greater than the sum of its parts;
this gives us another way to share these things from outside the community.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
