General Discussions about LUGNET : 12245


Administrative / General / 12245	12244 \| 12246

Subject:	Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 04:41:15 GMT
Viewed:	1647 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Joseph Greene wrote: > > Um, if you need to resort to profanity, then I submit that you have already > lost the argument. Who said anything about argument? I often use words in normal conversation that would probably be considered profane here. ROSCO

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
(...) As do many people, but what most, while doing so, don't realize is that they are on some level arguing for or against something. Whether the argument is with the 2 $^#$%$#^ bricks that won't separate or the @#$^& thing you dislike (for (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
(...) Um, if you need to resort to profanity, then I submit that you have already lost the argument. Profanity itself is the use of socially agreed upon words which have no real meaning in any given situation, but rather express distaste in a (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

42 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search