To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 1301 – 1320 of about 136000.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
 
Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <386A5CF5.B1434BC3@c...eb.net>... (...) all (...) Treating (...) Just a comment, when did regulation of the waste disposal industry occur? Around the same time that Civil Rights was in full swing? While the Civil (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) I'm okay with idea of abortion as the killing of a living thing, but not as murder. Murder can be defined as "the unlawful killing of another person." I deny that a foetus is a person with rights under the law. The foetus is not independent, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: This is disgusting!...
 
(...) This is all very worthy. 2 Questions. 1. What is the wealth of "richest nation in the world" based on? Hard work? Some human rights abuses? Exploitation? A mixture? 2. If taking action on the Afghans for their "egregious human rights (...) (23 years ago, 7-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  ATTN rtlToronto er's
 
(and John Neal, and all those other people I met at brick events - yes even you Steve Whit, and Nick) I dont care what the interweb says, i still think you are all better than Web 2.0 friends :) (URL) rights this stuff? that is all. Chris back to (...) (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) I was hoping not to engage Larry in this debate because I believe my viewpoints are valid even though I might not be able to defend them as aptly as Larry can defend his. I am not a good debater and Larry, as I think we all know, is a (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Description vs. argument
 
(...) Indeed. So what is the point of your system, if your "god given" rights can be removed the government? Are they only fair weather rights? (...) I know of no UK school which has a "whites only" policy in the last century. I know of no UK (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Gotta love Oracle...
 
(...) Huh... does that mean only a few can decide my rights, if I belong to the mob? I disagree with you all the way. If more people want it, it is to be done. (...) (sorry, did not understand... please provide synonym. TIA) (...) Ah, yes. See (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Preaching to the Choir
 
(...) That's sorta irrelevant-- As I stated elsewhere, yes, I'm all for allowing polygamy, etc (provided some probably some other changes), and all for letting consenting aliens get married if we find any, but that's not the point. The proposed (...) (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
Larry, I would like to understand the Libertarian principle better, but am finding it hard to understand from your responses in the various debates that have occured. What is the Libertarian view laws and law enforcement? We can all certainly agree (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: New S@H Catalog
 
(...) Interesting... So all non-winning entrants get to retain full rights to their designs? That I didn't expect. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Once again, even with all our problems, Canada--a great place to live...
 
Hi all, it's been a while! The subject of this post seems curious to me. Canada is a great place...why? Dave, are you reacting to the court's decision or to this journalist's gushing? The way I see it, the writing in that piece was sub par in that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) No, I'm sure he means State/Government. If you distil "society" (as you're referring to it here) down, it amounts to two forces: - market (in that if "society" frowns upon certain activities, there will be influence on cost/benefit analysis (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
 
(...) Lego did not license the Kiddicraft design. They took it and *slightly* modified it. The Kiddicraft design, although patented in the UK, was not protected in Denmark. They bought all of the residual rights to the brick (in the early 1980s) (...) (15 years ago, 18-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Lego Creator Success
 
(...) Not anymore, IMHO. (...) I can't think of one piece of CD software I own (all entertainment titles) where I can't either install it all to the hard drive directly, install it all the hard drive and change the drive letter in an .INI file, or (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) There you go again, mixing theory with practice. In _theory_, someone/some committee _with all the information_ making decisions can do better (as measured by the utilitarian principle) than the free market. Much in the same way that in (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) What a cop out. Why wait? You'll NEVER figure out ALL the details, nor will anyone else. All you can do is set up a system in which there is a clear, and just, way to resolve issues, and rights are protected. That's what Libertarians are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: slight
 
(...) Well, I am not the one claiming to be a messenger of something that no one wants to hear about in debate. John is claiming such a thing, in addition to all other kinds of rights to judge others via morals, politics, what have you...maybe not (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) This point is valid. There is no perfect society and Libertarianism does not claim to be able to achieve one. It merely claims to be able to make things better. (...) Answer this question yourself, please. I know why it failed. I suspect you (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  VTOL backpack
 
This is the coolest thing I have seen all week. Found this article in Aviation Week Magazine. All the usual copyright stuff applies. (URL) call first rights on building the first MOC. :^) Stay Tuned. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) I agree. I've actually thought a plan of universal reversible sterilization would do just fine, with some form of proof of worthiness to be un-sterilized. The worthiness part is the tricky part - I know I'm not qualified to make decisions like (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.017)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR