LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1 – 20 of about 136000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
<366C20C0.1D3A29CA@c...OSPAM.com> <F3M105.K52@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Certainly conquerors and war happen, and certainly there is murder, theft, abuse, and hate, but don't tell ME (...) (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.277)

		rights to SW pieces
A couple of months ago, there was some string going around about who owned the rights to the SW lego pieces. I happened to be checking out Ben Rogers' SW lego sight and he had some really nice scans of the club magazine that's released in the UK. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.188)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Please please please, don't anyone remove that key syllable, thank you. The new Victoria's Secret catalog just came, you'll have to excuse me while I go study it closely. (1) (...) I certainly understand the first quoted statement you make in (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.175)

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) Neither more nor less, because they are not actually different things. Right to life and right to property are the same thing. ALL rights are property rights in my schema. The "right to life" as I see it is my right to dispose of my life as I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.144)

		Re: An aside on the "Plagiarism" thread...
Actually, it does make sense to "copyright" your designs. Let me explain: By placing a copyright notice on your webpage, you indicate that the original content (i.e. your creative ideas) is your intellectual property. Anyone who does not ask (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.142)

		Re: Misperceptions of America (Was: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep)
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote (...) That is one major problem, yes. Unless you have a 100% accurate legal system there is always the problem of compensating someone for a period of slavery. As we have discussed before, compensation relies (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.136)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
(...) I think a word is missing. How about: "all rights are necessarily property rights" and "some rights aren't necessarily property rights"? (...) I think before I can do that, I need you to explain what a property right is. Where does this (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.129)

		Re: Voluntary, private discrimination (Was: Disparicies in Sentencing)
(...) Just trying to inject a little levity, Scott, which Sproat riffed on. I wouldn't interpret that post as anything other than as a response to me, so if you want to be annoyed, be annoyed at me. As to the more substantive issues, hey I like to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.122)

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) Not exactly. More like it IS everything else. Any right I recognise, ultimately, is a property right or can be reduced to one. (...) Well, here we go round the mulberry bush again, :-) but as I stated in the past, I don't accept the above as a (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.113)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
(...) OK, fair enough. Just to be clear, if we posit that there are no property rights, under such a system of rights calculus, it might well be OK for you to walk up to me and rip food out of my hand, food that I traded someone else for, or grew (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.104)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) <snipped derivation of 'all rights are property rights'> Larry, bookmark that post - you'll need it again. ;-) James (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.103)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Actually, that was a derivation _from_ all rights are property rights. Very big difference. Jasper (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.100)

		("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
This is the anchor of a new thread to deal with the subject proposition. Posters to this thread will have accepted the first parenthetized equality as true, and will have accepted that humans are life affirming, and that therefore to initiate the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.088)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
Hi Guys, This is a good read so far. Thanks. (...) I think the deal is that everything we collectively value about our modern social technology (even if some of us complain about governance) is possible strictly because our systems include an (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.082)

		Intolerance and property rights
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <38C99133.A47A4F64@v...er.net>... (...) I'm a bit curious as to how patents fit into this scheme. One the one hand, it is clearly good to protect the investment that went into an invention (both "dollars" and the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.081)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Will you stop? Where do you get that idea? What "higher power"? That's not it at all. My goodness what a stew of misconceptions. Do you listen to anything I say or are you just so sure you know what it is that it all blows past you? One more (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.080)

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
(...) For one thing, I did not commit to refuting this particular point within your basic premise. That was another thread. For another, I said there that I would accept your basic premise that "all rights are property rights" You're trying to turn (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.080)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) OK, change that to ANYwhere in America or Canada. But yes, it's biased. That's the point! That's the society I want to see us return toward, a society in which everyone knows that if they work hard and are clever, they've got just as much (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.071)

		Lego gadget thing
Have you all seen this, someone forwarded it to me. ---...--- This message was forwarded to you as a service of Tipomatic To receive your very own copy of this tip in your email box each day, visit (URL) - (URL) Presents The Gadget of the Day Monday (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.066)

		Re: Which of the Ten Commandments are Libertarian? (was: Re: Mormon bashing again)
(...) You only need 1... this one: 8 - Thou shall not steal. All the rest that make sense derive from it. (left hanging and unproved in a previous thread is the assertion that "all rights are property rights" and "no initiation of force" and "people (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 5.066)

More: Next Page >>