Subject:
|
Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:06:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1350 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.year.2001, Mark Sandlin writes:
> My point, however, was: If they're going to
> reuse parts (the Pteranodon/ Raptor head) Why didn't they reuse something
> that looks like a pteranodon instead of sticking a raptor head on the
> brick-built Pterosaur body?
Because the pteranodon piece is a SPUD, and they want to get back to more
flexibility?
eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
| (...) I agree. Thats the problem. As an adult I am torn between wanting exacting realism and buildability. Especially since Pteranodons, Pterodactyls and Pterosaurs have always been my favorite extinct animals I wish Lego had made a better head (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
| (...) I agree with this sentiment. My point, however, was: If they're going to reuse parts (the Pteranodon/ Raptor head) Why didn't they reuse something that looks like a pteranodon instead of sticking a raptor head on the brick-built Pterosaur (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
