To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 710
709  |  711
Subject: 
Re: New Dinosaurs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:42:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1311 times
  
In lugnet.year.2001, Eric Joslin writes:
In lugnet.year.2001, Norman Mensing writes:

I'm not sure yet what to say about the Spionsaurus. At first sight it looked
very unlego-ish to me. But after I had a closer look, I might change my mind:

The front and the rear part of the torso look like it's two identical parts,
which you can put arms or legs (probably in different sizes) and a neck or a
tail piece on.

It's actually *4* parts.  Not identical.  You have seen that it is divided
symmetrically from side to side, making what you think are two identical parts
in the front and back- it's also divided from front to back symetrically, so
the body is actually four seperate peices (according to pictures I have seen).
This means you can vary the length and width of the body by inserting bricks!

After having another look, I agree happily. The more parts, the better.

That's modular, but still not Lego.

Unfortunately, you snipped the rest of my post. The next sentence was
begining with "But". I only wanted to say that at that point I did not see
any typical Lego-Stud-Connections.

Well, I for one feel that it's a pretty LEGO way of making organic creatures >in a modular way.

As I said, I might change my mind to liking it. If I find out that I can use
the torso pieces e.g. in a spaceship and attach something else than limbs to
it, I will actually love those pieces.

-Norman



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New Dinosaurs
 
(...) I'm sorry, I didn't mean to misrepresent what you were saying. <:( I try to trim stuff down to it's bare minimum, perhaps in this case I was a little overzealous. (...) Well, we know the torso piece limb placement will hold a dragon arm. That (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Dinosaurs
 
(...) It's actually *4* parts. Not identical. You have seen that it is divided symmetrically from side to side, making what you think are two identical parts in the front and back- it's also divided from front to back symetrically, so the body is (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)

24 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR