| |
In lugnet.year.2001, Norman Mensing writes:
> I'm not sure yet what to say about the Spionsaurus. At first sight it looked
> very unlego-ish to me. But after I had a closer look, I might change my mind:
>
> The front and the rear part of the torso look like it's two identical parts,
> which you can put arms or legs (probably in different sizes) and a neck or a
> tail piece on.
It's actually *4* parts. Not identical. You have seen that it is divided
symmetrically from side to side, making what you think are two identical parts
in the front and back- it's also divided from front to back symetrically, so
the body is actually four seperate peices (according to pictures I have seen).
This means you can vary the length and width of the body by inserting bricks!
> That's modular, but still not Lego.
Well, I for one feel that it's a pretty LEGO way of making organic creatures in
a modular way.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Dinosaurs
|
| (...) After having another look, I agree happily. The more parts, the better. (...) Unfortunately, you snipped the rest of my post. The next sentence was begining with "But". I only wanted to say that at that point I did not see any typical (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New Dinosaurs
|
| (...) Actually we should love those new Raptors and the Pteranodon. I, too, think that they don't look as "cool" as the Spinosaur, but I think it's a great approach of TLC not to make more SPUDs, but add some smaller special parts and build up the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
