Subject:
|
Re: Pic: New Green Building
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:29:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
723 times
|
| |
|
|
Actually, that's not what I was saying. In this particular instance, one
can see into the building. And the ones next to it that are full of
activity. If you can't see in, I'd agree that there is no reason to do the
detailing unless one wants. That's why we are not worried about the subway
car with the detailing only on the side of the viewer. (Since the back run
is hidden in the module itself.) But when you stand an empty building in a
town of full ones, it looks a little out of place.
And building a boring building does not reflect on the builder. I've built
lots of lousy looking things, and would consider this a very self esteem
destroying standard to apply my creations attributes to myself. <grin>
-John 3
In lugnet.trains.org, Katie Dokken writes:
> In lugnet.trains.org, John Kelly III writes:
>
> > I know I'd like
> > your building more if they had interior detailing. Empty floors are boring.
> > That's the biggest (no pun intended) problem I've had with the stuff of
> > yours I've seen so far.
>
> Uh oh! Guess I'm boring as well. I only furnish the first floor of those
> buildings that you can see into. I never even make floors for the other
> "floors." Why bother if you can't see in anyway? Waste of brick. No wonder
> my buildings aren't welcome anywhere. I just don't conform to anybody's
> "standards."
>
> Katie
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pic: New Green Building
|
| (...) Uh oh! Guess I'm boring as well. I only furnish the first floor of those buildings that you can see into. I never even make floors for the other "floors." Why bother if you can't see in anyway? Waste of brick. No wonder my buildings aren't (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
