To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 7148
7147  |  7149
Subject: 
Re: Container Width (was Re: New MOC: Cargo Sprinter)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:10:42 GMT
Viewed: 
2166 times
  
In lugnet.trains, James Mathis writes:
> I've attempted a 5-wide container to place on my Cargo Sprinter or the • standard
> LEGO road trucks with trailers that hold the "normal" 4 wide by 16 long LEGO
> design containers.
> 
> This 5-wide container can stack above or below 4 wide containers.
> 
> It seems pretty versatile.  But, the mounting points on the bottom of the
> 5-wide are inset by 1/2 stud; this interupts the smoothness of the container
> "box".  But, the standard LEGO design 4-wide containers have discontinuity
> along their base, as well, so maybe it doesn't matter?

The 5-wide container looks great on the 6-wide train. Looks like 5-wide may be
the winner.

> http://www.ee.nmt.edu/~jmathis/cargosprinter.html
> 
> Sorry, I can't visualize the drawing shown below.  Maybe I've duplicated what
> has already been done?

Sorry, ASCII art just doesn't work well anymore, no one ever used fixed space
fonts anymore. My method was different, but your solution looks just as good
or better.

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Container Width (was Re: New MOC: Cargo Sprinter)
 
I've attempted a 5-wide container to place on my Cargo Sprinter or the standard LEGO road trucks with trailers that hold the "normal" 4 wide by 16 long LEGO design containers. This 5-wide container can stack above or below 4 wide containers. It (...) (26 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

24 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR