Subject:
|
Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:53:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
711 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
John Neal wrote in message <383B2665.A4C40D72@uswest.net>...
<snip>
>
> That is why I think that we should be forming the LTMA (LEGO Train
> Modelers Association) and begin doing our own thing. Have our own
> shows. Promote LEGO trains. Promote LEGO. Create our own newsletter.
> Maybe some day a magazine. I think this has the best chance of catching
> TLC's attention. Perhaps they would want to become involved in some
> manner in such an organization. Being apart of anything else is
> extraneous and not about what we are about-- building and enjoying LEGO
> trains.
>
> Comments?
>
> -John
Yes, exactly.
(You might want to look at electronic publication as a "ramp-up" to printed.
Lower production costs at the beginning (but harder to generate revenue
with.)
You can always print it if you require hard copy. Many of the killer Lego
train
websites would make a nice "issue" in and of themselves.)
I would be interested.
:?) bishop
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | LTMA vs NMRA
|
| There is a lot of debate going on right now about the perceived future of LEGO trains. Many fear TLC will abandon the theme and that they will be left high and dry. Some fear that those fearing the demise of the theme will bring in non-LEGO elements (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread: ![LTMA vs NMRA -John Neal (23-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Jim Rorstrom (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Steve Martin (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Todd Lehman (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -John Neal (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Mike Poindexter (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Frank Filz (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Larry Pieniazek (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -John Neal (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Frank Filz (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Tony Priestman (25-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -James Powell (25-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Tony Priestman (25-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Frank Filz (24-Nov-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -Harvey Henkelman (10-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -John Neal (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA -Larry Pieniazek (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA -Christopher Masi (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -James J. Trobaugh (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -John Gerlach (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LTMA vs NMRA -John Neal (12-Sep-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|