To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 7322
7321  |  7323
Subject: 
Re: LTMA vs NMRA
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 02:40:52 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswestSTOPSPAMMERS.net
Viewed: 
2073 times
  
Harvey-

Thanks for resurrecting this thread.  I had to go back and read all of it and
found it all very interesting, especially in the light of this recent post which
went by mostly unnoticed:  http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=7201

Now, I realize that being discontinued can mean the end of the 9 volt system with
a *new* system to replace it, or just plain death.  Frankly, I'd love to see TLC
go back to the drawing board and start from square one.  I wish that they would
consult us FOLTs first so that they don't muck it up!

NOW, let's suppose for the sake of argument that TLC in fact *does* can the 9
volt Train theme.  I am curious as to everybody's reaction.  Would you bail on
trains altogether?  Would it not affect you at all?  I know what I'd do, but I'd
like to hear from others first...

-John

Harvey Henkelman wrote:

> In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > There is a lot of debate going on right now about the perceived future
> > of LEGO trains.  Many fear TLC will abandon the theme and that they will
> > be left high and dry.  Some fear that those fearing the demise of the
> > theme will bring in non-LEGO elements into the fray thereby diluting the
> > all-LEGO component currently being observed by most FOLTs.
> > 
> > Much of this discussion, IMO, reveals the ambiguity of the LEGO train
> > hobby.  What is it that we really want?  I used to think that I wanted
> > to be recognized and respected as a model railroad builder in a
> > particular medium in and among the MRR community.  Now I don't.  It was
> > Steve Barile who suggested the International LEGO Train Conference that
> > got me to thinking.  Why did I want to be a part of the NMRA?  Other
> > than the recognition, what else was there for me and my LEGO trains?
> > Nothing.
> > 
> > That is why I think that we should be forming the LTMA (LEGO Train
> > Modelers Association) and begin doing our own thing.  Have our own
> > shows.  Promote LEGO trains.  Promote LEGO.  Create our own newsletter.
> > Maybe some day a magazine.  I think this has the best chance of catching
> > TLC's attention.  Perhaps they would want to become involved in some
> > manner in such an organization.  Being apart of anything else is
> > extraneous and not about what we are about-- building and enjoying LEGO
> > trains.
> > 
> > Comments?
> > 
> > -John
> 
> I know this is an old topic, but I was in the Navy at the time and didn't even
> know about LEGO trains. I used to be a member of the NMRA, but I can say from
> my experience that NMRA folks kinda look down on those who don't 1.Get their
> stuff from Walthers catalogs 2.Count every damn bolt and rivet, and 3.If it's
> not HO or N scale,you're out!
> 
> I fully support the idea of a separate LEGO train association. Bring all the
> various LEGO train clubs under one roof, so to speak. But none of the
> ridiculous politics that characterize the NMRA should be included either
> (remember, we're supposed to have fun doing this-not determining the 'purity'
> of others' creations. I simply combined my two greatest loves in life (trains
> and LEGOs), then I sought others out who did the same. So if theres others out
> there who still share this idea, you can count me in. -Harvey Henkelman



Message has 3 Replies:
  What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
(...) I think I would remain active in Lego Trains. Whether or not I stayed with 9V or converted to the putative new system depends on the details. I convert all my 12V stuff to 9V, not because (V is better than 12V operationally, (it isn't, 12V has (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
John, Well I guess the first thing I'd have to do (like many others) is hord all the 9V stuff I could get my hands on, mainly track, engines and wheel sets. Really I don't think I would "bail" on trains, in the past year and a half I haven't bought (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
(...) I'd (...) If LEGO were stupid enough to stop making trains, I'd probably dump my entire collection and start building HO or O scale... Anyone want to offer me about $15,000 for the entire collection? Considering the intelligence that LEGO has (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
(...) I know this is an old topic, but I was in the Navy at the time and didn't even know about LEGO trains. I used to be a member of the NMRA, but I can say from my experience that NMRA folks kinda look down on those who don't 1.Get their stuff (...) (26 years ago, 10-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)

22 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR