Subject:
|
Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 06:51:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.*SayNoToSpam*net
|
Viewed:
|
885 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I'm of two minds here. I think being inside an organization is often a
> way to effect change. After all, that's why I was a registered Democrat
> the whole time we lived in NY, Democrats were where the power was. Never
> gave up on being Libertarian.
By that theory we should be infiltrating TLC, not the NMRA.
> So I don't think I'd NOT join the NMRA. I think there is value in
> working for change. I let my membership lapse years and years ago but I
> may reenlist.
>
> Yet there is value to the LTMA idea as well. Can't we do it as a SIG?
Explain.
> G Scale used to be looked down on as toylike but now has wide
> acceptance.
I *still* look down on LGB-- it sucks almost as badly as Lionel.
<commencing flame suit donnage>
-John
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
>
> NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| I'm of two minds here. I think being inside an organization is often a way to effect change. After all, that's why I was a registered Democrat the whole time we lived in NY, Democrats were where the power was. Never gave up on being Libertarian. So (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
