To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 25965
25964  |  25966
Subject: 
Re: Train Factory palette
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:31:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2441 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

  
  
Ooh, I like your V2... it has lots of parts that non trainies would like too (they can trade off the few train specific things like wheels...)

Some nits to pick

I think I’d go with more large windows than small, maybe 2:1? Have to agree on the colors, earth tones are where it’s at.

i agree on the ratio 2:1 but for the colors i would rather see all of the green parts as dark green. now yes dark green is more valuble which would make a good excuse in its self but the real reason is dark green is more valuble to prototyping. everything from euro steam to pullmans are closer to the dark green than bright.

Ya, good catch. Dark green is a sweet color and replacing everything green in JM’s proposal with dark green is the way to go.

  
  
I think I’d dump the straight wagon plates, those are easy to come by in regular sets. Replace with more drop centers perhaps, in different colors (red and yellow come to mind, or even brown!)


i dissagree, while not very usefull to alot of adult train builders they are still usefull to the kids. the other thing is that they are large enough that they could be a seperate item instead of bagged with additional parts. as for colors i agree that brown would be cool but probably not universal enough to be usefull. basic black and perhaps darkstone gray would be more universal in there usefullness.

I guess I come at this from, is this going to replace all the other service packs out there, all the other sets out there? if it is, then yes, basic stuff is needed. but if it’s an enhancement, then I think it should have only parts you can’t get other ways (conveniently or in enough quantity to be useful). So I don’t know if I agree or not because I don’t know the answer to that question! I THOUGHT it was an enhancement but could be wrong.

James poses another good question in his reply, should this parts pack make “some” model or is it OK if it just rounds out existing sets and parts assortments. The answer to that one depends on the above, is this a replacement or an enhancement. Again, I thought it was a round out rather than a standalone.

If this parts pack is broken down into bags for Lego Factory (and, as an aside, for LF purposes I would suggest that they divide bags by color, put all the tan together rather than all the 1x2x3 windows, for example) then the basic bricks needed to make the rest of the rolling stock item presumably come from other bags already in the palette.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Train Factory palette
 
(...) my guess is that any so called bulk pack would start out as an enhancement but would adventuly become a replacment as it would be less sku's. time will tell. (...) i agree on the parts being sorted by color especialy if the lego company is (...) (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Train Factory palette
 
(...) i agree on the ratio 2:1 but for the colors i would rather see all of the green parts as dark green. now yes dark green is more valuble which would make a good excuse in its self but the real reason is dark green is more valuble to (...) (19 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

40 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR