Subject:
|
Re: Train Factory palette
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:48:25 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJMASI@*ihatespamNOGARBAGEPLEASE*RCN.COM
|
Viewed:
|
7706 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi wrote:
>
> > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> >
> > > In lugnet.trains, Jan-Albert van Ree wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > One part I would really want in a track pack or palette is the pantograph
> > > > > shoe (I have only one and would LOVE to get more :)
> > > >
> > > > But PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE the NON-clickhinge version...
> > >
> > >
> > > That comment basically applies to ANY part being considered that has two
> > > versions.. (it wasn't really mentioned yet, but it would apply to the tailgate
> > > part, to the club car window part, etc etc)
> >
> > I have a feeling that asking for un-clicky-hinged versions of parts is
> > like asking for old gray or a clasic smiley.
>
>
> True, true, but I'm thinking I would almost rather not waste the slots in the
> palette with clicky hinged versions... they're that bad. I'd rather ask for what
> I actually want and be told no, then decide what to do.
>
> YMMV of course.
We will have to be careful or will start another undying thread... and
someone will decide that we need a lugnet.hinges news group :)
Chris
--
http://users.rcn.com/cjmasi/lego/
Learn about brittle bone disease
http://www.oif.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Train Factory palette
|
| (...) True, true, but I'm thinking I would almost rather not waste the slots in the palette with clicky hinged versions... they're that bad. I'd rather ask for what I actually want and be told no, then decide what to do. YMMV of course. (21 years ago, 18-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
