To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 20463
20462  |  20464
Subject: 
Re: LDCC and Boosters
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:21:53 GMT
Viewed: 
2796 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
> > "Tom Cook" wrote:
> 
> > > I tried running two LDCC RCX bricks in parallel to gain more current. • It was
> > > not a success.  I'm assuming phasing issues and conflicting commands • are to
> > > blame.
> > 
> > Yes, the phase of the signals would have to be tightly in sync
> > to make this work.
> 
> I'm wondering how you could possibly get the signals synced closely enough • for
> this to work without a physical cable connecting the two RCX internals
> (clocks??? I dunno). What is the cycle timing on these compared to • instruction
> clock rate? Even being off by 1% would, I would think, cause pretty good • surges
> of current, ne?

The CPU instructions can be anywhere from 1/8 to 1 microsecond
(or longer) in duration.  Assuming you could sync up to within 1us,
you'd still be off by ~2% since the pulse duration for  1/2 of a
DCC "1" bit is 58us.  Hooking up a pair of RCXs in parallel with
that kind of error would probably heat things up pretty quickly.

The test code I wrote to slave a second RCX using the sensor I
mentioned (in the other post)  is only accurate to about ~8us because
of A/D limitations.  It's probably not to DCC specifications
but the decoders I tested it with (DN121, DZ143) didn't seem
to mind.  Improved code and/or an alternate sensor design
should be able to get it to specs.

Mark (who finds it kinda amusing to be geek'n in .trains).



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LDCC and Boosters
 
(...) You'd have to look at the actual spec's for DCC, which are hosted by NMRA. I'm not sure what they actually call for- I know they are fairly tolarent of misdeeds. James (how nice to have someone geeking for us!) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDCC and Boosters
 
(...) I'm wondering how you could possibly get the signals synced closely enough for this to work without a physical cable connecting the two RCX internals (clocks??? I dunno). What is the cycle timing on these compared to instruction clock rate? (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)

24 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR