Subject:
|
Re: LDCC and Boosters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:18:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1030 times
|
| |
|
|
> The test code I wrote to slave a second RCX using the sensor I
> mentioned (in the other post) is only accurate to about ~8us because
> of A/D limitations. It's probably not to DCC specifications
> but the decoders I tested it with (DN121, DZ143) didn't seem
> to mind. Improved code and/or an alternate sensor design
> should be able to get it to specs.
>
> Mark (who finds it kinda amusing to be geek'n in .trains).
You'd have to look at the actual spec's for DCC, which are hosted by NMRA. I'm
not sure what they actually call for- I know they are fairly tolarent of
misdeeds.
James
(how nice to have someone geeking for us!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDCC and Boosters
|
| (...) It was (...) are to (...) for (...) instruction (...) surges (...) The CPU instructions can be anywhere from 1/8 to 1 microsecond (or longer) in duration. Assuming you could sync up to within 1us, you'd still be off by ~2% since the pulse (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
