Subject:
|
Re: LDCC and Boosters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:40:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2609 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
> "Tom Cook" wrote:
> > I tried running two LDCC RCX bricks in parallel to gain more current. It was
> > not a success. I'm assuming phasing issues and conflicting commands are to
> > blame.
>
> Yes, the phase of the signals would have to be tightly in sync
> to make this work.
I'm wondering how you could possibly get the signals synced closely enough for
this to work without a physical cable connecting the two RCX internals
(clocks??? I dunno). What is the cycle timing on these compared to instruction
clock rate? Even being off by 1% would, I would think, cause pretty good surges
of current, ne?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDCC and Boosters
|
| (...) It was (...) are to (...) for (...) instruction (...) surges (...) The CPU instructions can be anywhere from 1/8 to 1 microsecond (or longer) in duration. Assuming you could sync up to within 1us, you'd still be off by ~2% since the pulse (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDCC and Boosters
|
| (...) to (...) use a (...) you (...) connecting (...) I haven't really looked at commercial DCC boosters, but I have been looking at the various homebrew designs on the net. Haven't gotten past the "contemplation" phase, though. :-) (...) was (...) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
