Subject:
|
Re: City blocks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 03:20:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
823 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.town, Kevin Wilson writes:
> Chris Leach wrote in message ...
> > In lugnet.town, Kevin Wilson writes:
> > > Do we need a max size?
>
> > I was thinking a max size so that the cross roads would work and so there • is
> > a "standard" to work with.(my whole point of this)and we get a more block
> feel.
>
> I like towns where the blocks are not all the same size, personally, and
> it's often necessary to fit into a given table area.
>
> If there was no max size, there would be nothing stopping you standardizing
> as a club or personally on a 2x3 baseplate block, but it wouldn't restrict
> others who might not need or want that restriction.
>
> Kevin
Ok... now the fun part is we still need to come up a good standard for
connecting buildings....:-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: City blocks
|
| (...) If I am following this right, standard block 2 x 3, add roads on 2, 3 or 4 sides depending on placement in block group. If you fill the block, then attachment to other buildings would be self contained on your block. Sidewalks would be on road (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: City blocks
|
| Chris Leach wrote in message ... (...) is (...) feel. I like towns where the blocks are not all the same size, personally, and it's often necessary to fit into a given table area. If there was no max size, there would be nothing stopping you (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
