Subject:
|
Re: Technicopedia Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 May 2009 22:30:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
27411 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Stephane Simard wrote:
| |
Hi Eric, awesome update.
It’s no wonder that I only have three technic universal sets in my collection
- and one of these was a gift, 8020. The other two are 8082, along with 8456,
the fiber optic set from 1996, which I consider a universal set despite the
numbering. Never wanted to bother with the rest.
I read the entire thing this morning. I noticed a few typos, such as using
whatever instead of whatsoever a few places.
|
I no longer have a proofreader, so please feel free to let me know where you’ve
found errors and I’ll correct them. Just send me a personal email.
I feel the same about the universal sets. I find that 8062, 8082, and 8094 are
very good. The others are good if you don’t have any other Technic sets and can
only buy one or two, but otherwise not so much. The 3 in the 8400 series which
are not technically universal sets (8456, 8479, 8485) are all excellent though.
Eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Technicopedia Update
|
| (...) Agreed. 8479 while having 4 models has a one clear "main" model. 8485 in my mind, has two main models and one alternate model. But neither are universal sets. 8094 is a universal set, in my line of thinking. (16 years ago, 17-May-09, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technicopedia Update
|
| (...) Hi Eric, awesome update. It's no wonder that I only have three technic universal sets in my collection - and one of these was a gift, 8020. The other two are 8082, along with 8456, the fiber optic set from 1996, which I consider a universal (...) (16 years ago, 17-May-09, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
