Subject:
|
Re: SW set list for 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:18:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
Huh, I replied to it just as it came in via email. I had been online,
checked mail, wrote a couple of posts, checked again and it was
there and I responded to it. Guess it was just a little delayed reaction
getting to me.
It's at 14.75 as I write
Ryan
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/14/1999, at 12:09 PM, Eric Hampusgård wrote:
> > > I'll believe it (or not) in about 16.5 hours (see www.lego.com).
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > Hmm, my calculations say @ 15.4 hours
> >
> > Ryan
>
> Whoa, my calculations say you read his comment about one hour later
> from when he wrote it. If you take a look now, it might even be down
> at 14 hours. =]
>
> // Eric (time moves, even in news)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| Dennett wrote; (...) Still, looking at the time stamps on the mail - you answered one hour later, but then again, the answer on my mail was written 50 minutes BEFORE I wrote it. =) Figure that one out for a 2x4 red brick! My guess is that it's (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| (...) Whoa, my calculations say you read his comment about one hour later from when he wrote it. If you take a look now, it might even be down at 14 hours. =] // Eric (time moves, even in news) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
