Subject:
|
Re: SW set list for 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:22:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
 | |
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 05:34:20PM +0000, Joel Hoornbeek wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, James Brown writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, James Simpson writes:
> > >
> > > There is no exscuse for the way that Boba Fett was killed off in ROTJ. He had
> > > too much potential as a character, and the grudge between he and Han had too
> > > much plot potential to be abandoned and resolved so easily. A major mistake
> > > by Lucas, I think. . . and a major let-down. Ewoks were bad enough . . . I
> > > can accept them (finally) . . . but the sorry way that Boba Fett was killed
> > > off in the movie . . . NEVER!
>
> Actually, he didn't die. I'm not sure if it mentioned elsewhere, but the
> first book in the "Bounty Hunter Wars" series of books by K.W. Jeter tells of
> how he basically blew his way out of the Sarlacc. The writing level isn't of
> the same level as Timoth Zahn (few writers are), but overall I thought it was
> pretty good.
I thought one of the Ewok specials (or something) had him survive because
of his armor. Hmmm....Maybe I'll do some research.
Ciao!
--
Let the machine do the dirty work.
-- "Elements of Programming Style", Kernighan and Ritchie
The Doctor What: Second Baseman http://docwhat.gerf.org/
docwhat@gerf.org (finger docwhat@gerf.org for PGP key)
KF6VNC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| (...) had (...) Actually, he didn't die. I'm not sure if it mentioned elsewhere, but the first book in the "Bounty Hunter Wars" series of books by K.W. Jeter tells of how he basically blew his way out of the Sarlacc. The writing level isn't of the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:   
  
    
                          
             
            
          
         
           
           
         
           
         
     
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|