Subject:
|
Re: SW set list for 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:25:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
632 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, James Simpson writes:
>
> There is no exscuse for the way that Boba Fett was killed off in ROTJ. He had
> too much potential as a character, and the grudge between he and Han had too
> much plot potential to be abandoned and resolved so easily. A major mistake
> by Lucas, I think. . . and a major let-down. Ewoks were bad enough . . . I
> can accept them (finally) . . . but the sorry way that Boba Fett was killed
> off in the movie . . . NEVER!
??? Well, hate to say this, but, um, it happened.
Boba Fett was a minor character who filled a specific plot point, and was
written out when no longer necessary.
The only reason anyone cares at all is that he looked cool.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| (...) had (...) Actually, he didn't die. I'm not sure if it mentioned elsewhere, but the first book in the "Bounty Hunter Wars" series of books by K.W. Jeter tells of how he basically blew his way out of the Sarlacc. The writing level isn't of the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| (...) There is no exscuse for the way that Boba Fett was killed off in ROTJ. He had too much potential as a character, and the grudge between he and Han had too much plot potential to be abandoned and resolved so easily. A major mistake by Lucas, I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
