To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 3960
3959  |  3961
Subject: 
Re: SW set list for 2000
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:28:51 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@io.com+AntiSpam+
Viewed: 
762 times
  
Matthew Miller wrote:
Joel Hoornbeek <joel@webaccess.net> wrote:
how he basically blew his way out of the Sarlacc.  The writing level isn't of
the same level as Timoth Zahn (few writers are), but overall I thought it was
Oh my god let me just take this moment to say: the Timothy Zahn Star Wars
novels were some of the worst writing I've ever seen.

Hear, hear.  I started reading one when I was a lab assitant on a quiet day,
and about fifty pages into the book, I realized that I had more fun being
bored.

Plot twists you could
see coming from, um, parsecs away.

Uh, shouldn't that be:  "plot twists you could see coming within the next
fifteen parsecs"...?  :-P

Cheers,
- j (I can loathe that book in two parsecs flat) sproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Jeremy: "Hi, my name is Jeremy Sproat, and I'm a...Slashdot Lemming."
All:    "Hi, Jeremy."



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SW set list for 2000
 
(...) Oh my god let me just take this moment to say: the Timothy Zahn Star Wars novels were some of the worst writing I've ever seen. Plot twists you could see coming from, um, parsecs away. And about every other person is described as having (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)

39 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR