Subject:
|
Re: back on track ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:55:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
709 times
|
| |
|
|
"Paul Hartzog" <panarchy23@yahoo.com> writes:
> i don't know how this thread got so off-topic so fast
> but after more discussion in chat,
>
> the bottom line here is NOT TO IMPOSE
> a standard on anyone,
>
> turns out there are a few salient points:
>
> 1. std for minifig airlocks is diff than
> 2. std for cargo doors
>
> also
>
> 3. std connector for connecting the
> docking components together
How about this idea: hold a contest. Post it in lugnet.build.contests
and everything. People submit proposals for docking rings or airlocks
or whatever, and then people vote on the proposals, and whichever is
the most popular can be adopted as "the standard". The submitters
should also agree to give up the intellectual property ownership of
the standard to the public domain.
There could be two separate categories: minifig and cargo. Also there
might be separate airlock and non-airlock versions of each.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward hermit@bayview.com http://www.bayview.com/~hermit/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | back on track ...
|
| well, i don't know how this thread got so off-topic so fast but after more discussion in chat, the bottom line here is NOT TO IMPOSE a standard on anyone, turns out there are a few salient points: 1. std for minifig airlocks is diff than 2. std for (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
