Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 May 2006 14:34:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3077 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, David Hurley wrote:
> Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG
> decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism
> described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave
> communication, which is not described in the spec to my knowledge. But it does
> make commuications easier among NXT's from what it sounds like.
I am not certain but I believe that the NXT does not allow direct slave-slave
communication. An NXT can be both a master and a slave in a hierarchical array
of NXTs (to the best of my knowledge) but two slave NXTs cannot directly
communicate with each other. The way I understand it, the master NXT would have
to have a program running on it which would take a message from slave 1 and pass
it on to slave 2.
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) OK...it looks like this messaging mechanism in (URL) is a little confusing. Steve cleared this up a bit in (URL) In the hierarchy he discussed, N0 has to go through N1 to talk to N2-4. This model can be extended to higher levels in a tree (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave communication, (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
