Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 May 2006 03:09:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2805 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, John Hansen wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, David Hurley wrote:
> > Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG
> > decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism
> > described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave
> > communication, which is not described in the spec to my knowledge. But it does
> > make commuications easier among NXT's from what it sounds like.
>
>
> I am not certain but I believe that the NXT does not allow direct slave-slave
> communication. An NXT can be both a master and a slave in a hierarchical array
> of NXTs (to the best of my knowledge) but two slave NXTs cannot directly
> communicate with each other. The way I understand it, the master NXT would have
> to have a program running on it which would take a message from slave 1 and pass
> it on to slave 2.
>
> John Hansen
So, if any NXT can be both master and slave, could you hook 3 of them up in a
triangle? A is master over B, B over C, and C over A?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) I am not certain but I believe that the NXT does not allow direct slave-slave communication. An NXT can be both a master and a slave in a hierarchical array of NXTs (to the best of my knowledge) but two slave NXTs cannot directly communicate (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
