Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 May 2006 19:25:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3247 times
|
| |
|
|
> However, (almost like Brian said) Connections 1,2,&3 are outgoing
> connections.
> That's like if this NXT originates a phone call. And, it has one incoming
> connection (connection 0).
>
> So, when you send a message, you specify the "connection" and the
> "mailbox" the
> message is going to.
>
> Clear as mud?
>
> Steve
So you can use a motor port as a sensor input and/or use a motor as an input
device (and vice-versa)?
-Rob
www.brickmodder.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Port types (Re: NXT to NXT communication?)
|
| (...) Not exactly. There was talk about that early on. You can not use the sensor port to drive a motor, and you can not use the motor port to read an analog (old style) sensor. The hardware specs may have changed, so I may not be 100% on this, but (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) The motors offer little resistance when used this way. However, there's something else which I think is kind of cool. If you look close, when I let go of the controller, the paddles return to the middle, and the car stops. Using just one block (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
