Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 May 2006 00:38:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3066 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.robotics, Ross Crawford wrote:
> So they could potentially be programmed to provide force
> or shudder feedback?
That's one possibility.
> Brian said:
> > all the incoming messages come in over one channel (connection
> > [0]; connections [1], [2], and [3] are for outgoing messages),
> >
> > This is not exactly true. All connections are bi-directional.
> > You can send and receive over each connection.
OK, that's a much better way of phrasing that :). The thing that's a little
confusing (to me) is that means that if the NXT named "Ann" wants to communicate
with one named "Ben", you can establish a BT connection with Ann as the "master"
(sending messages out on connection [1], for instance) and Ben as the "slave"
(replying over connection [0]). So while they have one "connection", each NXT
refers to it in a different fashion ([1] or [0], in this case).
> Are these multiple connections available via the LEGO retail software
Yep. One single block to send a message, another to receive. Very simple,
it's just the connection terminology that gets me.
> what you describe sounds like you could have more than
> 2 working together?
Yes. For instance, with Ann as master I think you could have:
Ann [1]--> Ben
[2]--> Cat
[3]--> Dan
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) So they could potentially be programmed to provide force or shudder feedback? (...) Yes, but I'm interested to know: Are these multiple connections available via the LEGO retail software, or did you program your pair some other way? It's just (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|